Emmanuel Dunand/AFP/Getty Images
FLORENCE, S.C. -         Mitt Romney revealed for the first time today that his effective tax rate is "closer to         15 percent," suggesting that he pays less in taxes than many middle income Americans despite being worth an estimated $250 million.
"What's the effective rate I've been paying? It's probably closer to the 15 percent rate than anything," Romney
 said during a press conference after an early morning rally. "Because 
my last 10 years, I've…my income comes overwhelmingly from some 
investments made in the past, whether ordinary income or earned 
annually. I got a little bit of income from my book, but I gave that all
 away. And then I get speakers fees from time to time, but not very 
much."
According to his personal financial disclosure report released in 
August, Romney was paid more than $370,000 for speaking appearances in 
the 2011-2011 filing period.
Under pressure by his rivals to release his tax returns, a move he said during last night's         Fox News/WSJ debate he will not take before April,         Romney today offered a rare glimpse into what the coveted documents may reveal. What Romney admitted is exactly what billionaire Warren Buffet has railed against - the fact that many multi-millionaires actually pay far less in taxes than the people who work for them.
In addition to hinting at his tax rate, Romney suggested that if he does
 release his returns, he will only release those from 2011 and not those
 from years prior.
"In prior races for president the tradition has been that the nominee 
releases his tax returns in tax season, in April," Romney said. "And I 
know that if I'm the nominee, people will want to see the most recent 
year, and see what happened in the most recent year and what things are 
up to date, and so they'll want to see the tax returns that come out in 
April, so rather than sort of have multiple releases of tax returns, 
why…we'll wait until the tax returns for the most recent year are 
completed, then release them."
In addressing his differing positions from former Sen. Rick Santorum and former former Speaker Newt Gingrich, Romney said that he is opposed to Gingrich's plan to eliminate capital gains tax for high income individuals - the very tax he suggested he pays.
"I also think that the speaker's plan to eliminate the capital gains tax
 for high income individuals - capital gains, interest and dividends - 
would not only be a very expensive provision in terms of having to fill 
an even larger budget hole but that would provide for people of very 
high income a possibility of no tax at all," said Romney. "You'd have 
individuals - the Warren Buffet argument - Warren Buffet, Bill Gates would probably pay no taxes at all. Today they probably pay 15 percent."
"Very high-income people of this country pay roughly 15 percent of taxes
 if their resources are coming from investments, and under their plan it
 would go to zero," said Romney. "I just don't think that's the right 
course. I think that with our precious dollars we should focus on 
providing relief - tax relief - really in two areas: one is for 
middle-income Americans that have been hurt the most and secondly is to 
bring our corporate tax rates to a level where we could draw people from
 other countries to bring their funds into this country."
Romney also addressed how he accounts for the 120,000 jobs he cleaims to
 have created during his work at Bain Capital, a number he himself 
offered during last night's debate.
"Let's get the math, alright?" said Romney, who appeared irritated as he
 was followed to his campaign bus by a crush of reporters.
"Four companies created 120,000 jobs. It's very simple," said Romney. 
"Four companies created 120,000. Staples, Bright Horizons, Steel 
Dynamics, and… which one am I missing? Sports Authority. If you look up 
their 10Ks today, you'll find that they have 120,000 jobs. Those were 
all businesses I helped get started."
"So those four created about 120,000 jobs," Romney continued. "And then 
all of those businesses that had been well-documented by various people 
over the years, when I ran in '94, when I ran last time, when I ran for 
governor, those that have lost jobs, they end up being a little less 
than 10,000, those that were losers. So if you took the ones that were 
losers, and compare with the ones that were, those four, at least, why 
you end up with something over 100,000."

No comments:
Post a Comment