KABUL (Reuters) - The Afghan Taliban denied on Saturday that the group s
leader Mullah Omar wrote to the White House last year.The White House
received a letter in 2011 which purported to come directly from Mullah
Omar, asking the United States to deliver prisoners whose transfer is
now central to American efforts to broker peace in Afghanistan, an Obama
administration official said Friday.'Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
rejects this baseless rumor with the strongest of words,' a statement on
the Islamist group s website said, using the name by which the Taliban
often calls itself.The letter, intended for President Barack Obama,
reportedly expressed impatience that the White House had not transferred
five former senior Taliban officials out of Guantanamo Bay military
prison.The White House itself was 'skeptical' the letter was actually
from Mullah Omar, the official said, though others within the
administration believed it was authentic.'Hoping for surrender from the
Afghan people is an unrealistic wish and a goal which could not be
achieved by America in the past ten years,' said Saturday s statement,
attributed to Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid.The Taliban last
month said it would open a political office in Qatar, suggesting the
group may be willing to engage in negotiations.After more than a decade
of war, Washington and its allies are announcing plans to steadily
withdraw their troops amid doubts about the ability of the Afghan
government and its nascent security forces to confront ongoing
violence.This week, U.S. Defense Secretary surprised Kabul by suggesting
the American combat mission could end in 2013, well ahead of the
end-2014 deadline agree with Afghan President Hamid Karzai for the exit
of foreign combat troops.'The U.S. is committed to the Lisbon timetable,
which means that combat operations by international and Afghan forces
are fully resourced and capable as necessary until the end of 2014 and
beyond,' U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan Ryan Crocker said in a statement
Saturday.'This is not a change in policy or strategy but recognition of
the progress we all agreed to achieve in Lisbon.' (Reuters)
No comments:
Post a Comment